Yes. There's a big difference between pseudonymity, with a consistent identity, and anonymity, where every comment may as well be your first. The possibility of damaging one's reputation -- or developing a great reputation and getting people to like you -- in whatever community the pseudonym's being used in makes it just as useful as a real name in terms of allowing the social controls within that community to function.
Changing from internal-to-the-community social controls (shunning or warning newcomers or whatever) to external social controls (calling someone's boss and repeating things they may not want the boss to know) is major badness no matter how much trouble you had to go to to get the boss's name.
It's not the people who are using consistent pseudonymous identifiers who are in the wrong here.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-03 10:12 pm (UTC)Changing from internal-to-the-community social controls (shunning or warning newcomers or whatever) to external social controls (calling someone's boss and repeating things they may not want the boss to know) is major badness no matter how much trouble you had to go to to get the boss's name.
It's not the people who are using consistent pseudonymous identifiers who are in the wrong here.
(by all means, unscreen if you like)